пятница, 16 августа 2019 г.

Logisticaudit, Best Practices, Methods, Principles and Tools for Logistics and Supply Chain Manageme

logisticaudit. Best Practices, Methods, Principles and Tools for Logistics and Supply Chain Management Practitioners. Logistic Audit. Purpose : To match the logistic requirements and services, taking the market condition into consideration, and to identify relevant areas for improvement. What is a Logistic Audit? In a logistic audit (potential analysis / logistic due-diligence) the current logistic system and its services are compared with the requirements. In particular, the performance of the processes and structures are checked. The purpose is to identify possible routes of failure and spheres of action for improving the quality and performance of the logistics system in general, and the logistic processes in particular. The procedure is done in five steps: requirements analysis; performance analysis; process analysis; structural analysis and benchmarking. The objectives of a logistic audit are: To point out the weaknesses of the logistic system and/or its subsystems. To estimate the impact and potential for performance improvements. To identify and demarcate the largest potential areas for improvement. Procedure. The potential analysis consists of five individual steps, which together cover all relevant aspects for auditing a logistic system. Step 1 – Requirements Analysis. Collection of logistic service requirements of all customers (end customers, market, sales, etc.) and the critical assessment of these requirements. Do these requirements correspond with the company strategy? Is there an appropriate ratio of the costs for meeting the requirements and its benefits? Are there any articles which cause higher costs than benefits and are not required by the customer? Are there any key customers which should be given delivery preference? What are the service levels and the agreed delivery time for different customer groups? If value-added services are offered, what would the financial and customer side effects be of a reduction or improvement of those services? The requirements collected as a result of this analysis must be critically examined, because in surveys individuals may exaggerate or overemphasize their requirements. For example, customers may demand a 24 hour service or express deliveries, but if the customer is charged for this service (e.g. express surcharge, packaging surcharge) many will prefer to waive the services. In addition, not all services actually fit with the corporate strategy. Step 2 – Performance Analysis. The performance analysis examines at what cost, with what efficiency and with what quality the logistical services are provided. For this purpose, by means of an input-output analysis, the cost (direct and indirect) for each logistic service is determined. In general, the performance and quality of individual logistic processes are raised and evaluated on the basis of key performance indicators (KPIs). In detail, performance analysis consists of: The bottlenecks in the supply chain are unveiled by analyzing the average waiting times or capacity times. There are also areas in which utilization ratio may never rise above 70-80% for example, and thus these areas may be overstaffed. Logistic functions differ in practice, often in relation to availability or speed of service provision. In particular, there is often a mismatch with regards to the mean residence time and actual processing time of an order. For example, the warehouse is staffed 24/7, because the products must be delivered the next morning. Most positions in companies are staffed by two or more employees to ensure the service delivery, in case of failures caused by illness, etc. This should be carefully checked: Is a complete redundancy on technical systems really necessary or would it be enough to keep the redundancy only for certain subsystems? Furthermore, is a single member of staff sufficient with a better coordination of the process flows? Which business units exceed the defined lead times and completion dates more often? Why is that happening and what extra costs arise by exceeding the lead and completion times? Are there any working stations where a disproportionate number of errors occur? What costs are caused by error handling? What are the main and relevant logistic costs? Depending on the kind of business, the transportation, warehousing or packaging can be the main cost drivers. Have they been identified? The cost reduction programs should start here. Step 3 – Process Analysis. The process analysis examines all the logistics processes, from the customer to the supplier. This may reveal differences between customer expectations and actual logistic performance. The following ten potential fields should be taken into account: Logistics units – Which loading equipment is in use, and what costs are assigned to these loading units? Is the use of loading units appropriate for each case? Master Data – Is there an adequate logistics database? Who is responsible for master data maintenance? What quality is the master data? Times – Are the times coordinated within the company? Are the defined times meeting the market requirements? Are there any bottlenecks and points of failure? Costs – Can cost rates be assigned to the services? Who is responsible for ensuring the prices per service are appropriate? How do you validate whether prices are appropriate according to the market requirements? Stocks – Where are the stocks maintained and why? How do you control the stocks from a strategic point of view, but also on the operational level? Which stock keeping procedures and policies are available? Quality – Is there a quality management system in place and what quality standards are used? Who is responsible for quality improvements? How are the failures tracked? Is there a system in place for continuous improvements? Interfaces – Is collaboration internally/externally organized, and how is this done? Which entities are processed manually and electronically? Planning/Process Control – Are the resources optimally planned? Who decides on the disposition quantities and how? Are standardized programs being used? Supply Chain – Which supply chains are in place or can be classified for the company, and which are considered as critical (in terms of cost, time, quality and risk)? Who manages these supply chains, under what procedure and in which institutional form? Make or Buy – Which parts are produced internally and what is bought from external providers? Who decides whether to make or buy, and who regularly performs comparative calculations? Step 4 – Structure Analysis. The structure analysis checks whether the existing system structures meet the requirements and what improvements are possible. On the basis of tree diagrams, the interrelationship between the areas are depicted and possible spheres of action are identified. The following questions must be clarified: Is the site and distribution structure appropriate to the market requirements and company strategy respectively policy? In what regulatory environment is the company involved? Are the responsibilities and tasks within and between the sites organized in an optimal manner? Is it possible to generate service improvements and cost savings by centralization/decentralization? Is the number of tiers in relation to the plant, the production and procurement correct according to the market demands, service level agreements and quality targets? Step 5 – Benchmarking. Benchmarking considers the company’s own performance relative to the industry, competitors, other divisions or in relation to a theoretical optimum. This can help highlight weaknesses and strengths in the company’s own structure. These services need to be compared comprehensively. Only analyzing the service performance, delivery capability, delivery time, and adherence to schedules is not sufficient. If costs are not also considered, you will receive a distorted view. When starting a benchmarking project, it is also important to take the environmental conditions (different regulations, different customer structure, etc.) into account. This article is based on: Gudehus, Timm & Kotzab, Herbert (2012). Comprehensive Logistics. 2nd. ed., Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. (ISBN 978-3-642-24367-7).

Комментариев нет:

Отправить комментарий